Want to boost your token's value and stabilize your ecosystem? Token buybacks might be the answer.

Token buybacks are increasingly popular in Web3, offering ways to reduce token supply, build liquidity, and engage your community. They’re not just for price support - they can strengthen protocol health and demonstrate long-term commitment to users.

Here’s what you need to know:

• Why Buybacks Matter: They can reduce circulating supply (e.g., Orca burned 25% of its tokens), stabilize prices, and enhance trust.

• How to Fund Them: Use protocol revenue (like Jupiter Exchange allocating 50% of fees) or treasury reserves (e.g., Aave’s $1M weekly buybacks).

• Execution Tips: Partner with skilled market makers to ensure smooth, compliant, and impactful buybacks.

• Key Strategies: Options include revenue-based buybacks, treasury-funded buybacks, buy-and-burn programs, and automated triggers.

Quick Comparison of Buyback Strategies:

Token buybacks can be a game-changer for your project - but only if designed thoughtfully. Start by ensuring stable revenue, clear governance, and strong partnerships with market makers.

Jupiter Announces 50% Buyback – Here’s Why It Matters

Prerequisites for Token Buybacks

To roll out a successful token buyback program, Web3 founders need to focus on three critical elements: consistent revenue generation, solid governance structures, and strategic partnerships with market makers. These elements set the stage for a buyback program that can genuinely benefit the protocol.

Revenue Streams and Treasury Management

A sustainable buyback program starts with dependable revenue and well-managed treasury reserves. Protocols need a steady income stream to fund buybacks without compromising their operations or development efforts.

For example, some projects allocate protocol fees specifically for buybacks. Cherry AI is a notable case, dedicating a significant portion of its revenue to automated buybacks and token burns.

When protocol fees alone aren’t enough, treasury reserves often come into play. Many projects maintain these reserves to ensure buybacks can continue during periods of reduced activity. However, this approach requires careful planning. Over-reliance on treasury funds could drain resources needed for other critical areas like marketing, development, or daily operations.

Governance and Decision-Making

Once funding is secured, clear governance processes are essential for deciding when and how to execute buybacks. Without structured decision-making, buyback programs risk becoming inconsistent or misaligned with the community’s interests.

Decentralized governance, often through DAOs, has become a standard for managing large-scale financial decisions. By 2021, DAOs collectively managed over $9.3 billion in assets, highlighting their growing role in Web3 governance. Many successful projects use a hybrid approach, combining off-chain discussions for cost-efficiency with on-chain voting for transparency.

Here’s how some established Web3 projects handle governance:

To encourage active participation, many protocols offer incentives like staking rewards or reputation points. Open communication, clear documentation, and regular engagement with token holders also help align buyback decisions with the protocol’s long-term goals.

Market Maker Partnerships

Partnering with experienced market makers is just as important as securing funding and governance. These professionals provide the tools and expertise needed to execute large-scale buybacks without disrupting token prices. Their services include liquidity provision, order management, and maintaining market depth.

When evaluating market makers, consider their experience and track record. Look for partners skilled in algorithm development, risk management, and technology solutions. Their connections with multiple exchanges can also ensure access to deep liquidity markets, improving buyback execution.

The type of partnership model matters too. Fixed-cost retainer agreements often offer greater transparency and allow projects to control inventory and timing. Alternative models, while reducing profit and loss risks, may provide less visibility into execution.

Transparency is key for measuring success. Metrics like execution prices, slippage, order fill rates, and overall market impact should be closely monitored and reported. Tailoring services to fit the project’s tokenomics ensures alignment with broader goals.

Lastly, regulatory compliance is non-negotiable. Market makers must adhere to the laws in relevant jurisdictions and provide compliant reporting for buyback activities.

Token Buyback Strategy Checklist

Web3 founders have a variety of buyback strategies at their disposal, each tailored to different revenue models, treasury conditions, and community goals. Choosing the right approach depends on aligning the strategy with your protocol's financial patterns and governance priorities. Below, we break down some of the most effective strategies and their applications.

Revenue-Based Buybacks

This strategy involves allocating a set percentage of protocol earnings to repurchase tokens, creating consistent buy pressure. For instance, one project channels 50% of its protocol fees into buybacks, while Raydium dedicates 12% of its fees to the same purpose. The success of revenue-based buybacks hinges on the protocol maintaining strong usage, steady performance, and ongoing growth.

Treasury-Funded Buybacks

In this approach, projects use their treasury reserves to fund scheduled buybacks, providing market support even when revenue fluctuates. For example, a project implemented regular buybacks using surplus treasury funds. Similarly, in April 2025, Aave approved a plan to conduct weekly buybacks of $1 million for a minimum of six months. While this method ensures predictable market activity, it requires careful governance to balance treasury allocations with operational needs.

Buyback and Burn Programs

Buyback and burn programs permanently remove tokens from circulation, reducing the total supply to potentially increase token value. A notable example is Orca, which, in April 2025, approved a $10 million buyback program that included burning 25% of its total token supply. The success of this strategy depends on factors like the scale of the burn compared to the circulating supply and the protocol's ability to maintain utility with fewer tokens in circulation.

Automated Buyback Triggers

Automated triggers offer a systematic way to execute buybacks without manual oversight. These triggers can be tied to scheduled intervals, profit thresholds, or specific milestones. Smart contracts typically manage this process, ensuring consistency and reliability. For example, Hyperliquid's Assistance Fund has repurchased over 20 million HYPE tokens - equivalent to $386 million or 6.2% of its circulating supply - demonstrating the effectiveness of automation. Similarly, in March 2025, dYdX launched its $DYDX Buyback Program, allocating 25% of net protocol fees to monthly buybacks. The success of automated buybacks lies in setting trigger conditions that align with the protocol's goals and current market dynamics.

Regardless of the strategy you choose, close collaboration with market makers is essential to ensure smooth execution and maximize the impact of buyback initiatives.

Market Maker Partnership Best Practices

Successfully executing token buybacks requires forming strategic partnerships with skilled market makers who can navigate market dynamics with transparency and compliance.

Choosing the Right Market Makers

The backbone of any effective buyback program is selecting market makers with a solid track record in liquidity management and maintaining token price stability. Given how much the crypto landscape has evolved, experience and proven results should be your top priorities.

When assessing potential partners, look for evidence of measurable outcomes. For instance, choose market makers who have demonstrated the ability to significantly tighten spreads - such as reducing them from 6% to 0.2% - which can help boost investor confidence.

Your partner's technical infrastructure is equally critical. It should support low latency, fast execution, minimal slippage, high fill rates, and tight bid-ask spreads. The best market makers rely on algorithmic systems to deliver real-time liquidity across both centralized and decentralized exchanges.

Adaptability is another hallmark of a strong market maker. They should be able to adjust their strategies based on market volatility, trading volumes, and your project's specific needs. Look for partners who offer tailored solutions to address your unique requirements.

Transparency and Compliance

Transparency is key when executing buybacks, and conducting these transactions on-chain can help build trust and ensure compliance with evolving global crypto regulations.

Ethical practices should be verified through reputable audits or clear performance reports. Market makers must be upfront about their pricing structures, service offerings, and performance metrics. This level of openness helps address concerns about market manipulation.

Additionally, your market maker should demonstrate a strong understanding of global regulatory environments. They need to navigate compliance requirements across the various jurisdictions where your token is traded, especially when buyback programs involve multiple exchanges or trading venues.

Timing and Size Optimization

Beyond transparency, carefully timing and sizing your buyback activities can significantly enhance their impact.

Strategic timing is crucial. Market makers can align buyback operations with key events - such as major announcements or new token listings - to maximize liquidity absorption while avoiding sharp price fluctuations.

Focusing efforts on key exchanges can also reduce liquidity fragmentation and help stabilize token prices, particularly for revenue- or treasury-funded buyback strategies.

To maintain accountability, track performance using formal key performance indicators (KPIs). Metrics like uptime, spread width, and order volume provide clear benchmarks to measure the success of your buyback program.

Using Simulation Tools

Before rolling out your buyback strategy, leverage simulation tools to validate decisions and fine-tune your approach.

Simulation tools, such as those offered by Tokenomics.net, allow you to test buyback strategies in a controlled environment. These tools can help you predict how various buyback sizes, timings, and market conditions might affect your token economy before implementing them in real-world scenarios.

By running multiple simulations, you can identify the best parameters to suit your token's specific characteristics and market conditions. Combining these insights with the expertise of seasoned market makers ensures your theoretical strategies translate effectively into practice.

Integrating data-driven predictions from simulations with the practical knowledge of market makers creates a powerful synergy, ensuring your buyback strategy aligns with your broader protocol goals.

Measuring Buyback Performance

To understand how well your buyback program is working, it's essential to track specific metrics. Without keeping an eye on these, it’s hard to know when or how to tweak your strategy.

Key Performance Metrics

Certain metrics are key to evaluating buyback success. These include reductions in circulating supply, the buyback-to-market cap ratio, and price stability. Together, they provide a clear picture of whether your program is delivering value to token holders.

• Circulating supply reduction: This is one of the most direct indicators of success. By regularly comparing total supply to circulating supply, you can measure the program's impact. For example, CoinEx’s approach reduced its circulating supply by an impressive 71% over six years.

• Buyback-to-market cap ratio: This metric shows how effectively funds are being used for buybacks. For instance, Jupiter Exchange allocates half of its protocol fees to buybacks, achieving a strong ratio within its peer group. On the other hand, Raydium directs 12% of its fees, illustrating how different protocols tailor their strategies to their needs.

• Price stability: A well-executed buyback program can help reduce token volatility. Data from SolanaFloor highlights that projects with buyback programs outperformed those without by 46.67% in 2024. Specifically, buyback-enabled projects showed a modest -0.6% year-to-date performance compared to -47.15% for those without.

Beyond these core metrics, it’s also worth tracking token velocity, network activity, and holder distribution. These can reveal how buybacks influence token usage and community engagement. Setting up dashboards to monitor key wallets and conducting regular internal audits can further enhance transparency.

Buyback Strategy Comparison

Choosing the right buyback strategy depends on your protocol's goals and stage of development. Each approach has its strengths and weaknesses:

For example, Hyperliquid’s revenue-based program has repurchased over 20 million HYPE tokens, worth $386 million, reducing 6.2% of its circulating supply. Treasury-funded approaches, like Aave’s $1 million weekly buyback program, provide predictability but require careful management of reserves.

Deciding between burning and redistributing tokens often comes down to long-term goals. Sky, for instance, burns 100% of repurchased tokens to drive scarcity, while Aave redistributes tokens through governance systems, maintaining active community involvement.

Strategy Adjustments Over Time

As markets evolve, so should your buyback strategy. Regularly reviewing performance data, adapting to market conditions, and incorporating community feedback can help fine-tune your approach.

• Regular performance reviews: Set a schedule - monthly or quarterly depending on your program’s scale and volatility. Compare metrics to benchmarks and use trends to guide adjustments. Aave, for example, tested a six-month buyback trial before committing to long-term changes.

• Market condition adaptations: Flexibility is key during volatile periods. Dynamic strategies adjust buyback amounts based on token price, volume, and sentiment. This ensures resources are used effectively, especially during favorable conditions.

• Community input: Engaging stakeholders through governance proposals or discussions ensures your strategy aligns with their expectations. Transparent communication builds trust and helps refine your approach.

• Trigger mechanisms: Some protocols use algorithmic systems to automatically adjust buyback timing and amounts based on price movements and trading activity. Others prefer manual oversight for greater control, though this requires active management.

• Stress testing scenarios: Tools like Tokenomics.net can simulate various market conditions, helping you optimize your strategy before implementing changes in live markets.

Lastly, keep an eye on unlock events and token issuance schedules. These can impact supply and your buyback’s effectiveness. For instance, intensifying buybacks before major unlocks or scaling back when new issuances occur can help maintain balance.

Conclusion

Token buybacks have evolved from being simple tools for price support to becoming integral strategies for managing ecosystems and driving value. As we've explored in this guide, creating a successful buyback program involves a careful balance of revenue generation, treasury management, partnerships with market makers, and ongoing performance evaluation.

One essential piece of the puzzle is collaboration with market makers. Without a strong liquidity framework, even the most well-funded buyback efforts can fall short. Effective market maker performance, paired with advanced stress testing, can significantly refine and strengthen your approach.

A striking example is Empirica's client, where improved liquidity management reduced price volatility from 165% to just 9%, highlighting the pivotal role of professional market makers.

In today’s tokenomics landscape, sophisticated modeling and rigorous stress testing are no longer optional - they’re essential. Platforms like Tokenomics.net offer dynamic simulations and expert insights to help design buyback programs that deliver results.

It’s important to remember that buyback strategies aren’t static. Market conditions shift, community priorities change, and protocol economics evolve. To succeed, buyback initiatives must remain flexible, with consistent monitoring and strategic adjustments to adapt to these changes.

This guide has covered the critical elements - from revenue and liquidity management to governance. Now, it’s time to put these strategies into action. By integrating these frameworks, you can strengthen your tokenomics strategy, build community confidence, and create lasting value.

FAQs

What are the best ways for Web3 founders to align token buyback strategies with community goals and long-term success?

Web3 founders can shape token buyback strategies to align with their community's goals by prioritizing open communication and involving members in governance decisions. This approach not only builds trust but also ensures that buybacks reflect the collective priorities of the project.

On top of that, crafting effective tokenomics that reward valuable contributions - like offering liquidity or actively participating on the platform - can drive sustainable growth. By syncing incentives with community interests and encouraging collaborative decision-making, founders can develop buyback strategies that benefit both the community and the long-term vision of the project.

What factors should Web3 founders consider when selecting a token buyback strategy, such as revenue-based, treasury-funded, or buy-and-burn programs?

When deciding on a token buyback strategy, Web3 founders need to weigh their funding sources and long-term objectives. For instance, revenue-based buybacks rely on project income, which can vary depending on market conditions. On the other hand, treasury-funded buybacks offer more consistency but might strain reserves over time. Another option, buy-and-burn programs, can help reduce token supply and potentially boost value, but they must be executed carefully to avoid any perception of market manipulation.

Ultimately, the best approach depends on your project's financial position, goals for sustainability, and the current market landscape. Whatever strategy you choose, it should align with your tokenomics framework and inspire ongoing confidence among investors.

How can working with market makers improve token buybacks, and what should web3 founders consider when choosing one?

Partnering with market makers can significantly enhance the effectiveness of token buybacks. By boosting liquidity, narrowing bid-ask spreads, and stabilizing token prices, market makers help ensure buybacks deliver a stronger impact on the token economy. This approach not only supports immediate goals but also contributes to long-term value growth.

When evaluating market makers, web3 founders should focus on a few critical factors:

• Experience: Look for expertise in crypto markets and a deep understanding of tokenomics.

• Liquidity management: A proven ability to provide consistent liquidity is essential.

• Reputation: A strong track record and credibility in the industry are non-negotiable.

• Goal alignment: The market maker should share the project's vision and fit seamlessly with its token model.

Choosing the right market maker ensures that your buyback strategy isn’t just effective but also sustainable and aligned with the broader objectives of your project.

Related posts

• Common Token Economy Problems and Solutions

• Ultimate Guide to Deflationary Tokenomics

• How Tokenomics Impacts User Onboarding